Taxation Without Representation in the District

There was a great op-ed in the New York Times today explaining the historical peculiarities of why the District doesn’t have a vote in Congress – effectively creating taxation without representation in the nation’s capital.

DC Vote License Plate

The occasion for the op-ed is the 50th anniversary today of the ratification of the 23rd amendment, which finally gave residents of D.C. the right to vote in presidential elections. (Yes, it took a Constitutional amendment!)

It seems strange that a city so consumed with politics – and with a population greater than the state of Wyoming – didn’t get the opportunity to vote for president until the election of 1964.

The District has long been denied full voting rights, both in national politics and for its own local government.

It’s the legacy of its creation as a federal district that could be controlled by Congress, and not subject to the whims of any state government. (We can thank the Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783 for that.)

But as Masur writes, it’s also a legacy of racial politics dating back to the Civil War.

The District was granted an elected mayor and city council by Congress in the early 1800s, back when the only eligible voters were white men. As black men won the right to vote after the Civil War, the city became a testing ground for outlawing racial discrimination in areas like public transportation, accommodation, and hiring.

Democracy in the District didn’t last long though – by 1874, the elected city government was replaced by three commissioners appointed by the president, and many of its progressive laws were overturned.

Eventually District residents won the right to vote for president and a single delegate for the House of Representatives (albeit without full voting rights). Home rule was established in 1973, once again granting the city a mayor and city council.

But Congress can still meddle in District affairs, particularly when it comes to its budget and social issues.

An amendment to grant Washingtonians full representation in Congress was passed in 1978, but was never ratified by enough states to go into effect.

Matalin and Carville - AP
Utah and Washington, D.C.?

More recently, there were attempts to pass the DC Voting Rights Act, which would have given a full House member to the District, offset with an additional House member for the state of Utah.

Why, Utah? It overwhelmingly votes Republican, while D.C. overwhelmingly votes Democratic. Like Mary Matalin and James Carville, it was a match made in heaven.

Unfortunately, a poison pill was added to the legislation in the Senate that would have outlawed the District’s gun restrictions, and the bill was DOA.

There have been other suggestions on how to enfranchise Washingtonians – one of them includes ceding the residential areas of the city back to Maryland.

The original ten miles square, diamond-shaped District was created from land ceded by Maryland above the Potomac, and Virginia below the river. (Virginia took its land back in 1846, which is why the District today looks like a jagged, truncated diamond.)

Washington DC Map
The current shape of the District, minus the land ceded back to Virginia.

No offense to Maryland, but I’d rather take my chances and hold out for the day that D.C. officially gets full voting rights.

Until then, we’ll share the status (if not the warm weather) of other territories like Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and Samoa – taxation without full representation.

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Taxation Without Representation in the District

  1. DC History Nut March 30, 2011 / 9:40 am

    Great picture of the famous bi-partisan couple!

    Do you know if President Obama uses the DC plates that say “Taxation Without Representation” on his limo?

    • Historic District March 30, 2011 / 7:43 pm

      Not so far, despite being a vocal supporter of DC voting rights…

      There was a lot of speculation around Obama’s inauguration about whether he would restore the license plate that Clinton first used. (One of Bush’s first official actions was to remove the “Taxation Without Representation” plates and replace them with the old ones.)

      This City Paper article says that Mayor-elect Vincent Gray brought it up with Obama in December, but didn’t get a firm answer from the president:

      http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/looselips/2010/12/01/gray-obama-likes-d-c/

  2. Andrea March 30, 2011 / 11:23 am

    Our taxation without representation is worse than PR – I think the only people who pay federal taxes there are those who work for the government. Jeez, DC gets shafted on all ends.

    • Historic District March 30, 2011 / 8:04 pm

      I think they pay federal payroll taxes, but not federal income taxes unless they’re government workers…yeah, we get no benefits from being a “territory”…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s